Take Action
Where to start
If you do one thing, sign up for updates. We’ll alert you when the SEPA comment window opens, when new permits are filed, and when community meetings are scheduled.
After that, here’s the sequence:
- Now: Write to the institutions below. Push them to prepare for the SEPA process and advocate for safety conditions. This is the groundwork.
- When Jupiter refiles: A 14-day State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) comment window opens. This is the decisive moment. If an issue isn’t raised during that window, it cannot be raised later in an appeal. Read our SEPA comment guide now so you’re ready.
You don’t need to contact everyone. Pick the one or two that matter most to you and write a short, specific email. The bullet points below give you exactly what to ask.
What you can do now
Write to Puget Sound Energy
PSE selected this project and this developer. Their own 2021 siting study screened all 382 substations and identified 15 recommended locations for energy storage. Mt. Si was not one of them. It didn’t even make the initial cut of 36 stations that received detailed analysis. The study’s criteria explicitly flag residential areas, schools, and hospitals as making a location less desirable. Four years later, PSE signed a tolling agreement for a 130 MW facility at the location their own consultant rejected.
PSE originally filed the tolling agreement with the UTC redacted in its entirety, and has sued the UTC to prevent further disclosure. UTC Commission Staff criticized PSE’s redaction pattern in an earlier procurement, writing that some information PSE redacted “does not appear to Staff to be commercially sensitive.”
Email: communityengagement@pse.com
Ask them:
- Why was Mt. Si selected after PSE’s own siting study screened it out? What changed between 2021 and 2024?
- Does PSE support a full Environmental Impact Statement for this project, given the site constraints their own siting study identified?
- Will PSE release the fire prevention, gas detection, and cooling system plans that their own 2021 RFP required BESS developers to provide?
Write to the Snoqualmie City Council
The site is in unincorporated King County, so the City of Snoqualmie has no permitting authority today. But the city has real leverage. It controls the franchise agreement with PSE. It is a named party to the development agreements that restrict what the adjacent PSE corridor parcels can be used for. Neither potential construction access route to the project site was designed for industrial traffic, and both have legal constraints the city can enforce. The city can also formally participate in the SEPA review.
Email: councilmembers@snoqualmiewa.gov
Ask them to:
- Send a letter to King County requesting a full Environmental Impact Statement for the Cascadia Ridge project. Three other King County cities (Covington, Enumclaw, Black Diamond) have already passed BESS moratoriums. A formal EIS request is a measured step that does not prejudge the outcome.
- Enforce the existing development agreement restrictions on the PSE corridor parcels. Construction traffic for the BESS project is not authorized under those agreements, and the city has standing to say so.
- Direct staff to formally participate in the SEPA review when Jupiter Power refiles.
- Update the city’s evacuation plan to address an industrial toxic release scenario. The current plan (November 2017) does not contemplate a chemical fire producing hydrogen fluoride adjacent to Snoqualmie Ridge.
Write to the Snoqualmie Valley School District
Cascade View Elementary is approximately half a mile from the proposed facility. School bus routes on Snoqualmie Parkway pass within 0.1 miles. PSE’s own siting study flagged schools as making a location less desirable for energy storage. The district has standing to comment on impacts to student safety during the SEPA review.
Email Superintendent Dan Schlotfeldt: schlotfeldtd@svsd410.org
Email the school board: svsdinfo@svsd410.org
Ask them to:
- Request a full Environmental Impact Statement from King County based on student safety concerns. A school district asking for rigorous environmental review carries institutional weight that individual comments cannot.
- Prepare to submit formal SEPA comments when Jupiter Power refiles, focusing on atmospheric dispersion modeling, shelter-in-place feasibility, and evacuation during school hours.
- Evaluate emergency preparedness for a battery fire during school hours. Can school HVAC systems switch to recirculation mode? What are the evacuation options if Snoqualmie Parkway is within a toxic plume?
- Review the Kent School District’s response to a similar proposal near Mattson Middle School. The Kent board passed a formal resolution on student safety grounds.
Write to Snoqualmie Valley Hospital
Snoqualmie Valley Hospital is the closest emergency facility to the project site. Hydrogen fluoride exposure causes deep tissue burns and pulmonary edema that require specialized treatment. The hospital would receive casualties from an HF release event.
Email Ken Rudberg (Director of Quality, Risk & Compliance): kenr@snoqualmiehospital.org
Ask them to:
- Request a full Environmental Impact Statement from King County. A comment from the local hospital on patient safety and emergency capacity carries institutional weight that individual comments cannot.
- Participate in the SEPA review when Jupiter Power refiles.
- Evaluate whether the hospital can treat mass hydrogen fluoride exposure. HF requires calcium gluconate and specialized decontamination protocols. Does the hospital stock these? How many patients can it handle simultaneously?
- Update the hospital’s emergency operations plan to include an industrial toxic release scenario from the adjacent BESS facility.
If you’re on a private well
The project site is surrounded by dozens of private domestic wells, with the highest concentration in the unincorporated residential area downhill to the southwest (31 water wells in that quarter section alone). The City of Snoqualmie also draws its municipal water from valley groundwater wells. Contaminated firefighting runoff from a lithium-ion battery fire (heavy metals, fluoride compounds, electrolyte) could migrate through soil to groundwater. No hydrogeologic assessment has been submitted for this project.
If you’re on a private well near the project site, you have a direct stake in the SEPA review. Your comment about groundwater risk carries weight that a general safety concern does not. See our groundwater analysis for the data, including well locations, depth ranges, and the Sumner precedent where a public water well on a BESS project parcel triggered the strongest groundwater conditions in any Washington BESS project.
When the SEPA comment window opens, submit a comment identifying your well and asking King County to require a hydrogeologic assessment before issuing a development permit.
Write to local fire agencies
Three fire agencies cover this area. Jupiter Power has confirmed it is coordinating with all three on emergency response planning. These agencies can formally participate in the SEPA process and advocate for safety conditions.
King County Fire Marshal Eric Urban: eric.urban@kingcounty.gov
Eastside Fire & Rescue Chief Will Aho: waho@esf-r.org
City of Snoqualmie Fire Department Chief Mike Bailey: mbailey@snoqualmiewa.gov
Ask them to:
- Request a full Environmental Impact Statement from King County. Eastside Fire & Rescue has already stated it “cannot confirm” preparedness for an incident of this type and scale. A formal EIS request from fire agencies carries significant weight.
- Prepare to participate in the SEPA review when Jupiter Power refiles.
- Evaluate whether existing mutual aid agreements can handle a multi-day battery fire producing hydrogen fluoride adjacent to a residential community.
- Assess fire suppression water supply. The project parcels have no municipal water connection, no fire hydrants, and no water mains.
When the SEPA comment window opens
Submit a SEPA comment
When Jupiter Power refiles their permit, King County will open a 14-day public comment window. The comments submitted during that period form the legal record. If an issue isn’t raised during SEPA comments, it cannot be raised later in an appeal. We’ll send an alert when the window opens.
Read our guide on how to write an effective SEPA comment. It covers the legal standard, the checklist elements relevant to this project, what makes a comment effective, and what to avoid. You don’t need to cover everything. One well-supported comment on a single topic is more valuable than a vague letter touching all of them. Start reading now so you’re ready the day the window opens.
Push the institutions above to submit formal comments
If you’ve already written to the city council, school district, or fire agencies, follow up during the SEPA window and ask if they plan to submit a formal comment. Institutional comments on the record carry more weight than individual letters. The more agencies that participate, the stronger the case for meaningful permit conditions.
Get informed
Understanding the permitting process, the technology, the fire risk, the site and environment, and what we’re asking for makes your voice more effective when the time comes.